Dear Coast Protectors,
I’m writing you from Edmonton, the other end of the Trans Mountain pipeline. Like most Albertans, I’ve followed your mobilization in opposition to the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion (TMX) with great interest. Unlike many Albertans, I am opposed to the building of more pipelines to transport increasing amounts of our oil to various markets.
If you don’t know any Albertans who oppose TMX, it might surprise you to hear that the opinions of Albertans on our oil industry are far more nuanced than they’ve been portrayed to be in recent public statements by Premier Notley and United Conservative Party leader Jason Kenney. A September public opinion poll by Abacus Data showed, at least at that moment in time, that 50% of Albertans support TMX, 25% could support it under certain (unspecified) conditions, 11% oppose TMX, and 14% are unsure about the project.
Polls can’t give us a definitive answer to what the public thinks about a contentious topic, but the Abacus poll indicates that a substantial number of Albertans are lukewarm to the project or oppose it altogether. This lack of consensus is one of the reasons I’ve been frustrated that not a single Alberta MLA is representing the viewpoint of Albertans like me who oppose TMX.
By now I’m sure you’ve heard the news that both Notley and Kenney are in favour of investing public money in TMX if that will help get the pipeline built. Notley has even gone a step further in saying Alberta is willing to buy TMX outright. Notley will also introduce legislation this week to enable the government of Alberta to reduce the amount of oil shipped to BC through the existing Trans Mountain pipeline.
If the Alberta government does end up reducing the flow of oil to BC, it’s possible they will be sued by oil companies with ongoing shipping contracts with Kinder Morgan. It’s a pretty safe bet that Notley is willing to accept this risk and that she believes the pain felt by British Columbians will be more severe because the price of gas and jet fuel will likely spike in the Lower Mainland area if supply is reduced. She clearly hopes the threat of reducing supply will cause the government of BC to issue permits faster and drop any legal action it’s pursuing.
The very real possibility that the government of Alberta will invest scarce public funds in TMX and reduce the flow of oil to BC is troubling for many reasons. Here are three reasons that are top of mind for me.
First, it’s a shaky argument that Asian markets for oil sands, specifically China, are a silver bullet for the ailing Alberta oil industry. China has several other ways of importing oil from Russia, Kazakstan, the US, Myanmar, the Persian Gulf, Algeria, Libya and West Africa. These alternatives are already in operation, are providing higher quality oil than bitumen, and are transporting the oil faster and more cheaply than can occur from the Port of Vancouver.
Second, Jason Kenney is trying to frame the potential cancellation of TMX as “an economic emergency for Alberta” that will affect Alberta’s “ability to pay for our pensions, our health care, our quality of life as Canadians.” The first part is an exaggeration. Alberta’s economy is doing well without TMX: our 2017 economic growth of 4.5% led the country, and our 2018 growth forecast of 2.7% is among the leading provinces. The second part reflects Kenney’s ongoing desire to privatize health care and restructure public sector pensions. It’s my view that TMX simply gives him more cover to pursue this decades-old agenda.
Third, the cancellation of projects like TMX means Canada is more likely to meet our Paris climate commitment, and it’s sad that First Nations and everyday folks need to organize a mass mobilization to get the governments of Alberta and of Canada to do what is necessary to meet our international commitments and begin significant efforts to wind down oil sands production by 2050.
Beyond fights over specific pipelines or possible new extractive sites, we need to continue the conversation about what a just transition away from fossil fuel extraction in our two provinces and elsewhere in Canada looks like. That’s the conversation we should be having – instead of letting Kinder Morgan pit our governments and provinces against each other.
Hope we can get together soon over some BC wine and Alberta beef,
Ian
Ian Hussey is a political economist at the University of Alberta’s Parkland Institute, and a steering committee member and the Alberta research manager for the SSHRCC-funded Corporate Mapping Project.
Showing 6 reactions
Thanks again for sharing your analysis.
I’m not a monster or against oil profits, its necessary evil to dire industry. But not cars or pipelines. Or inflated fuel prices based on price fixing or cartels.
All governments in G% nations should be working towards putting energy production into the hands of citizens. Solar, hydrogen cells and electric cars can put tons of money back into people’s pockets. Energy and auto fuel is a huge expense for people, taxed to death as well. Imagine an unlimited supply or making your own for free or nearly free?
Of course, they will tax the hell out of solar and alternative energy equipment rendering it unfeasible. Then there are always hackers like Elon Musk and Nikola Tesla, Steve Jobs and others find a way around regulations to benefit people. We have to rely on the renegades of technology to lead the way and provide for us al alternative to save our air, water and to reduce or eliminate many cancers caused by oil exposure. Our governments however, are clearly out to kill us and the land around us. Cigarettes are still sold everywhere and kill everyone who uses them and they tax and punish renewable energy. They aren’t looking out for your best interest in any way. Politicians treat us like we are a walking blindfolded moneybag made of sheepskin. :-)
We owe our current half price gas prices to Syria fighters. They are duping Syrian oil on the market cheap without any cartel or price fixing, they need guns and money fast. What its really worth. Which is the current price. Demand is lower.
Solar is now 1000 times more powerful, electric cars, Telsa solar roofing tiles and self powering homes, hydrogen generating vehicles and more to come.
Oil/gas is cancerous, poisonous, toxic, explosive, and it goes bad in storage after a while. Its quite volatile and dangerous compared to recharging lithium cells in a cel phone or Tesla car. Just minutes to charge, yet hundreds of miles to drive.
Many electric charging stations are actually free to attract shoppers to wal mart or tim hortons while you eat it charges up.
Safe, plentiful, clean, renewable, recyclable and logical. Oil/gas has become obsolete or its purpose and uses have changed recently.
Generally, air quality will improve and respiratory diseases will become nearly non existent, no oil spills and lost wildlife disasters. Less cancer too. Exposure to gas causes cancer.
Oil will always be needed in industry and heating applications. But for vehicles by the million its killing us a energy for getting around. Electric will eventually spread to Big Rigs, tractors, big machines and even lower voltage requirements in the future thanks to LED lights and low voltage electronics we have today. Much less energy consumed these days.
A pipeline to get Alberta oil to the Ocean to be carried by tanker across the sea to China isn’t really a good plan. China hasn’t committed themselves yet to buying this oil of ours. They said maybe. Now they partnered with Russia to Protect Syria .
Russia and China are partners and cheap oil is avail be to China now through Russian sources. Its cheaper to buy their oil next door. China also has the worlds largest solar array and growing. They hope to use only the sun for hydro very soon.
New technologies in solar developed by china. We are building pipelines and digging in oily dirt like scavengers. Meanwhile, China has their eyes on cheap Syrian and Russian Oil. Its close and Russia is their best friend who also sells oil. Our main customer for this pipeline (China) has bailed on the deal. There was never one in the first place.