Trans Mountain Pipeline Loses More Insurers as Insurance Divestment Campaign Heats Up

The global campaign is targeting Liberty Mutual and remaining insurers of the tar sands pipeline that runs from Edmonton, Alberta to Burnaby, BC, crossing dozens of Indigenous territories without consent. The Trans Mountain pipeline was constructed in 1953, when Indigenous people were forbidden to hire lawyers or or bring about land claims against the government without the government's consent.

German insurer Talanx will no longer back Canada’s controversial Trans Mountain pipeline, while Munich Re also signaled it will also drop the project after unveiling a new oil sands policy earlier this year.

Subsidiaries of both companies were named on Trans Mountain’s current Certificate of Insurance, which lists 11 companies providing $508 million of liability insurance for the 12 months to August 31, 2020. Talanx said that it pulled out of the project in 2019 and the current insurance certificate wrongly named its subsidiary HDI Global SE as providing $85 million of cover jointly with other insurers. Talanx adopted a policy limiting tar sands underwriting in 2020. 

Munich Re said it would review its support for Trans Mountain in the light of its new policy on tar sands, adopted in 2020, which rules out insuring tar sands extraction projects and dedicated tar sands infrastructure, such as pipelines. Its Canadian subsidiary Temple Insurance was Trans Mountain’s third biggest insurers, providing $250 million of cover, alongside other insurers.

“Trans Mountain put in the existing line without the consent of impacted First Nations and we have said no countless times to the proposed expansion. As Indigenous peoples we are stewards of our lands and waters. We have jurisdiction over activities that happen in our territories, and we don’t want them ruined by oil spills,” said Kukpi7 Judy Wilson, Secretary-Treasurer of the Union of British Columbia Indian Chiefs and Chief of the Neskonlith Indian Band. “We will continue to advocate against the insurers that continue to back the Trans Mountain pipeline and its expansion and call on all insurance companies to adopt policies stopping fossil fuel expansion.”

“Those insurers extending their policies beyond coal do understand they need to be in for a penny, in for a pound on climate action,” said Regine Richter, Energy Campaigner at urgewald. “Now Munich Re must show that they are serious about their policy and quit underwriting the Trans Mountain pipeline when the contract is up for renewal.” 

The existing Trans Mountain pipeline is a major environmental and public health hazard with a long history of disastrous spills. Earlier this month, 50,000 gallons of crude oil spilled from a pump station located above an aquifer that supplies the Sumas First Nation with drinking water. The Trans Mountain Expansion Project would multiply these risks tremendously.

Sven Biggs, Canadian Oil and Gas Programs Director at Stand.earth, said: “Talanx and Munich Re are joining some of the world’s largest financial institutions in steering clear of the oil sands sector. Trans Mountain is one of most controversial energy projects in Canada’s history, which is why a mounting list of insurers refuse to back the project.”

A global coalition of climate organizations, First Nations, and grassroots activists recently launched a campaign calling on the insurers of Trans Mountain to rule out backing the project when current policies expire on August 31, 2020. These statements from HDI and Munich Re will put pressure on Zurich, Liberty Mutual, Lloyd’s, and the six other insurers that have not yet commented on the project. European insurers Lloyd’s, Zurich, and Chubb’s European Group, are Trans Mountain’s biggest backers.

“With their new tar sands policies, Talanx and Munich Re recognize the major threats that Trans Mountain and the entire tar sands sector pose to Indigenous land rights, sacred waterways, and a safe climate future. The insurance industry is no longer tolerating these risks. In the US, pressure is mounting on Liberty Mutual to drop Trans Mountain and exit the destructive industry entirely,” said Elana Sulakshana, Energy Finance Campaigner at Rainforest Action Network. 

The Trans Mountain expansion is a litmus test for insurers’ commitments to the Paris Agreement which aims to limit global warming as close to 1.5ºC as possible. Dr Kirsten Zickfeld, lead author of the IPCC’s report Global Warming of 1.5ºC, has said Trans Mountain and other expansion of the oil industry and its infrastructure is not compatible with this target.

The global Insure Our Future campaign (formerly known as Unfriend Coal) has expanded the focus of its campaign to include all fossil fuels. It released a new set of demands last week, calling on insurers to stop supporting all new oil and gas projects and phase out fossil fuel business in line with 1.5ºC.  

To date, eight global insurers have adopted policies that limit or end insurance coverage for tar sands, citing concerns about the high-carbon intensity of the sector: AXA, AXIS Capital, Generali, The Hartford, Munich Re, Swiss Re, Talanx, and Zurich. These insurers join a growing movement of investors and banks that are shifting capital out of tar sands.

 


Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.